Human Rights Paradox in U.S. History

Posted on May 12, 2016

Featured Image for Human Rights Paradox in U.S. History

"Permanent Premises of the International Criminal Court" by UN Photo/Rick Bajornas CC 2.0 Generic

"Permanent Premises of the International Criminal Court" by UN Photo/Rick Bajornas CC 2.0 Generic
“Permanent Premises of the International Criminal Court” by UN Photo/Rick Bajornas CC 2.0 Generic

Writer and PhD candidate Joseph A. Ross works with his faculty mentor, Dr. Mark E. Elliott, in the UNCG Department of History. His poster, “Remembering Nuremberg: The Paradox of Human Rights in American History,” took 1st place in Humanities at the 2016 Graduate Research and Creativity Expo.

Joseph A. Ross, PhD Candidate, Department of History
Joseph A. Ross, PhD Candidate, Department of History

From 1945 to 1946, the United States played a pivotal role in organizing and trying a group of Nazi war criminals at an international trial in Nuremberg, Germany. One of the Americans who participated in the Nuremberg Trial was North Carolinian judge John Parker.

As a direct result of his involvement at Nuremberg, Parker advocated for international organizations such as the United Nations and especially a permanent international criminal court that would follow in Nuremberg’s footsteps. This permanent court never came to be in Parker’s lifetime, but the International Criminal Court (ICC) was eventually established in 2002.

However, while most of the world has joined, the US still has not. Though the U.S., through the efforts of people like John Parker, laid much of the groundwork for the international human rights movement that exists today, the U.S. government has largely retreated from this legacy.


Through the Research Perspectives blog, students, staff, and faculty share their successes in research, creative activity, and community and economic engagement with each other and the world at large. Interested in contributing? Click here. 

Read more news